Cell Phone Location Tracking State Laws – Track Cell Phone

39

Monitoring someone’s location is considered to be a privacy invasion because location data can reveal many details about the person you’re tracking. If you do track someone’s location, ensure that you’re following the law.

In America, location tracking requirements should obey state laws. State-specific cell phone location tracking laws define the legality of being able to monitor the GPS location of a phone within a particular location or in a particular state.

Cell phones and other mobile devices are crucial for communication today. Many people carry smartphones wherever they go, and they log into social networks every day. With the increasing popularity of smartphones as well as other devices keeping track a cell phone location of a person is just like a piece of cake.

Cell phones are the most common source of tracing or privacy attacks. In this article, we’re going to discuss state laws that will highlight the states of America.

Let’s get started!

Locating Cellular Phones Laws in State

Cell Phone Location Tracking State Laws

The police agencies are able to monitor mobile devices for legitimate motives. If they have a warrant from a judicial officer, police officers and forensics experts have access to the live location. Furthermore, Federal Government authorities are also authorized to obtain the details of any person.

For people like us, there are some rules and regulations. However, parents can monitor the location of their children in order to protect their children’s safety.

Courts in the United States are passing legislation that protects against illegal mobile phone tracking and protects users’ privacy.

We are here to discuss the location tracking of cell phones laws for each state in America.

Below are seven law orders covering 50 states in the United States.

  • A warrant is necessary.
  • No warrant required.
  • Competing authorities.
  • A few precautions.
  • Warrant required for HCSL details.
  • There are no binding authorities.
  • A warrant is required for all location-tracking information.
  • A warrant is required to track location in real-time detail.

Read More: 

How can you legally track a Cell Phone’s Location within Your State?

Scroll down to verify if your state’s laws permit you to track the location of cell phones.

  • Alabama: No warrant is required.
  • Alaska: There isn’t a binding authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Arizona: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Arkansas: There isn’t a binding authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • California: To track mobile phones, you’ll require authorization. Without a valid permit, you cannot monitor mobile phone locations.
  • Colorado: Legal regulations require location tracking.
  • Connecticut: There are some safeguards, but no legal laws require tracking of location.
  • Delaware: There are some safeguards, but no legal regulations require location tracking.
  • Florida: There are a variety of authorities that disagree on the location of mobile phones.
  • Georgia: No warrant is required.
  • Hawaii: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Idaho: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Illinois: To track mobile phone locations in real-time, they need authorization. Without permission from the law, you cannot trace the location of mobile phones.
  • Indiana: To monitor cell smartphones in real-time you’ll need authorization. Without a valid permit, you are unable to trace the location of mobile phones.
  • Iowa: There isn’t a binding authority to track mobiles. The location information is not protected.
  • Kansas: There isn’t a binding authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Kentucky: No warrant is required.
  • Louisiana: No warrant is required.
  • Maine: A warrant is needed. To monitor any location data on mobile phones it is necessary to obtain legal authorization from the law enforcement agencies.
  • Maryland: There are several contradicting authorities on the location of mobile phones.
  • Massachusetts: Warrants are necessary. To obtain HCSL (historical mobile site’s location) information, you must have a valid contract.
  • Michigan: No warrant required.
  • Minnesota: A warrant is required. To monitor any mobile phone’s location data you must obtain an agreement with the court.
  • Mississippi: No warrant required.
  • Missouri: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about location is not secured.
  • Montana: The warrant must be obtained. To monitor the location of all mobile phones it is necessary to obtain a judicial agreement.
  • Nebraska: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Nevada: No warrant is required.
  • New Hampshire: The warrant must be obtained. To monitor the location of mobile phones data, you must obtain a judicial agreement.
  • New Jersey: A warrant is necessary. To keep track of real-time mobile location data, you’ll require an agreement with the judicial authority.
  • New Mexico: There isn’t a binding authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • New York: There isn’t a binding authority to track mobiles. The location information is not protected.
  • New Carolina: No warrant is required.
  • North Dakota: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Ohio: No warrant is required.
  • Oklahoma: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. The location information is not protected.
  • Oregon: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Pennsylvania: Legal laws require tracking of location.
  • Rhode Island: A warrant is necessary. To keep track of any information about the location of mobile phones you must obtain valid permission.
  • South Carolina: No warrant is required.
  • South Dakota: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Tennessee: No warrant is required.
  • Texas: No warrant is required.
  • Utah: A warrant is necessary. To keep track of the location of all mobile phones you must obtain valid permission.
  • Vermont: A warrant is needed. To keep track of any mobile phone’s location data you must obtain a judicial authorization contract.
  • Virginia: There are various authorities who disagree about the location of mobile phones.
  • Washington: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • West Virginia: No warrant is required.
  • Wisconsin: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. Information about the location is not secured.
  • Wyoming: There is no enforceable authority to track mobiles. The location information is not protected.

Final Thoughts

For the reason of the increasing number of phone-related threats, American states are implying strict laws against illegal location tracking of individuals. Although certain states allow some latitude in their regulations, others only allow location tracking with a court warrant. Be sure to check your state’s laws prior to recording the location of your loved ones or your own.