Ben weighs 41.9 kg. His older brother weighs 57.6 kg. How much more does his older brother weigh?

Answer:

The equation of the circle is;

(x - 2)² + (y - 4)² = 5²  

Step-by-step explanation:

We note that the general equation of a circle is given as follows;

(x - h)² + (y - k)² = r²

Where;

(h, k) = The coordinates of the center of the circle

r = The radius of the circle

The given parameters are;

The location of the center of the pool to the center of their formation = 2 feet to the right and 4 feet up from the center of the pool

The point through which the circle which they form goes through = A point 3 feet to the left and 4 feet up from the center of their formation

Taking the center of the pool as the origin of the coordinate plane system, we have;

The coordinate of the center of the circle = The coordinate of their motion from the center of the circle

∴ The coordinate of the center of the circle = (2, 4)

∴ (h, k) = (2, 4)

h = 2, k = 4

The coordinate of the point through which the circle passes = (2 - 3, 4 + 4) = (-1, 8)

∴ The length of the radius, 'r', can be found as, r = √((-3)² + 4²) = 5 or r = √((-1 - 2)² + (8 - 4)²) = 5

r = 5

The equation of the circle is therefore presented by substituting the values of 'h', 'k', and 'r', as follows;

(x - 2)² + (y - 4)² = 5².

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Givens

You have the hypotenuse: 13

You seek the adjacent side: x

You have the angle enclosing the 2: 47 degrees.

The relationship is the Cosine

Solution

Cos(47) = opposite / hypotenuse

Cos(47) = 0.6820                            From your calculator

Cos(47) = x / 13                                Multiply both sides by 13

13*cos(47) = x

x=8.866

Answer:

that's easy, use the 6969 equation, with a some 420's and that will do it

Answer:

480 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

If one inch equals 40 miles, then 12 times that would be 4800 miles.

1 Inch          12 Inches

---------- =  ------------------

40 Miles     480 Miles.

Answer:

114

Step-by-step explanation:

To find - Find the sum of all the two-digit numbers that divide 170 with a remainder of 5.

Proof -

The 2 digit number is 11

170 = 11(15) + 5

The two digit number is 15

170 = 15(11) + 5

The two digit number is 33

170 = 33(5) + 5

The two digit number is 55

170 = 55(3) + 5

∴ we get

The two digit numbers are

11, 15, 33, 55

Their sum is equals to

11 + 15 + 33 + 55 = 114

Answer:

15.46 gallons per minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Garden hose was running for 1000 minutes

Volume of the pool = 15,460 gallons

What is the approximate rate at which water leaves the garden hose?

Rate at which water leaves the garden hose = Volume of the pool / running time of the hose

= 15,460 gallons / 1000 minutes

= 15.46 gallons per minutes

Rate at which water leaves the garden hose = 15.46 gallons per minutes

Answer:C

Step-by-step explanation:

I have taken a test and it was right sorry if it isn’t right

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

determine whether the equation has the form x=a, and if it does, the equation has one solution

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

EDGE 2021

q - p can be expressed as "If you do every exercise in this book, then you get an A on the final exam."

¬(p ∨ ¬q) can be expressed as "You need to do every exercise in this book and not get an A on the final exam."

The proposition "To get an A in this class or get an A on the final exam, you need to do every exercise in the book" can be written as "(r ∨ p) → q."

q - p: This proposition states that if you do every exercise in this book (q), then you get an A on the final exam (p).

¬(p ∨ ¬q): This proposition states that you need to do every exercise in this book (q) and not get an A on the final exam (¬p).

"(r ∨ p) → q": This proposition expresses that to get an A in this class (r) or get an A on the final exam (p), you need to do every exercise in the book (q). It is a conditional statement, where the antecedent is (r ∨ p) and the consequent is q.

For the truth table analysis:

[-p ∨ (p ∧ ¬q)] → q: The truth table should be constructed using the propositions p, q, and r, along with logical connectors. However, the given proposition doesn't involve the proposition r, so it cannot be analyzed using the truth table.

[(p ∨ q) ∧ r) ∧ (q → r)] → r: The truth table should be constructed using the propositions p, q, and r, along with logical connectors. However, the given proposition doesn't involve the proposition p, so it cannot be analyzed using the truth table.

Learn more about antecedent click here;

brainly.com/question/28845527

#SPJ11

Answer: 140cm^3

Step-by-step explanation:

To find out the single payment that is economically equivalent to the payment stream of $2,500 due today, $3,000 due 100 days from today, and $3,500 due 240 days from today, we have to follow the below-given steps:

Step 1: Calculate the Future Value (FV) of each payment. Let's assume that "P" is the single payment we need to find out and "i" is the annual interest rate (5%)P = FV × [1 / (1 + i/365)^n] where n is the number of days between today and the payment date. For the first payment of $2,500 that is due today, the future value is $2,500 because it is already available today. Hence, no calculation is required for it. For the second payment of $3,000 that is due 100 days from today, Future Value (FV) = $3,000 × [1+(0.05/365)]^100 ≈ $3,093.29For the third payment of $3,500 that is due 240 days from today, Future Value (FV) = $3,500 × [1+(0.05/365)]^240 ≈ $3,701.85

Step 2: Calculate the Present Value (PV) of the payment stream by discounting each FV to 80 days from today. The formula for the present value of a future amount is PV = FV × [1 / (1 + i/365)^n] where "n" is the number of days between the date of the future amount and the date on which it is to be discounted. Here, we need to discount all three payments to 80 days from today. The number of days between today and 80 days from today is 80. So, we put n = 80 in the above formula.

For the first payment of $2,500 that is already available today, there is no need for any discounting. Hence, its present value is the same as its future value, i.e., $2,500.For the second payment of $3,093.29 that is due 100 days from today, Present Value (PV) = $3,093.29 × [1 / (1 + 0.05/365)^80] ≈ $2,893.16For the third payment of $3,701.85 that is due 240 days from today, Present Value (PV) = $3,701.85 × [1 / (1 + 0.05/365)^80] ≈ $3,243.11

Step 3: Add up the present values of all three payments to find the present value of the payment stream Present Value of the payment stream = $2,500 + $2,893.16 + $3,243.11 = $8,636.27

Step 4: Calculate the single payment that is economically equivalent to the payment stream by calculating its future value at the end of 80 days. FV = PV × (1 + i/365)^n where n = 80, i = 0.05, and PV = $8,636.27FV = $8,636.27 × (1 + 0.05/365)^80 ≈ $9,040.07Therefore, the single payment that is economically equivalent to the payment stream is $9,040.07.

Learn more about economically equivalent:

https://brainly.com/question/2599759

#SPJ11

Answer:

47,600

Step-by-step explanation:

The rate is (32,800 - 18,000) = 14,800 per 5 years  

therefore :  

in 2015 = 2010 + 5 years  

the pop. will be :  

32,800 + 14,800 = 47,600  

The answer is 47,600.

Hope this helped :)

Answer:

2/4 quarts of juice is 0.125 Gallons of juice for

Step-by-step explanation:

Please Give Brainliest

Answer:

He divided instead of using multiplication

Step-by-step explanation:

The number of pizzas the people of the town will produce in a year, obtained using the simple mathematical operations, is 120 pizzas.

Mathematical operations include operations of additions, subtraction, division, and multiplication.

The number of pizzas produced in a year can be obtained using mathematical operations as follows;

The number of people required to produce one pizza in a month = 10 people

The number of people in the town = 100 people

The number of pizza'a that the people in the town can produce in a month is therefore;

Number of pizza's produced in a month  = 100/10 = 10

The number of months in a year = 12 months

The number of pizzas the people in the town can produce in a year = 10 × 12 = 120 pizzas

Learn more on mathematical operations here: https://brainly.com/question/1794851

#SPJ1

All interior angle degrees must add up to 180 degrees.

the little square means that it is a right angle (90 degrees)

30 + 90 = 120

Y = 60

Answer:

x=6

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) Using the method of maximum likelihood, the estimated parameter of the exponential distribution is λ = 0.050.

(b) Comparing the estimators obtained by the method of moments (L) and the method of maximum likelihood (M), we have L < M.

(a) The maximum likelihood estimation involves finding the parameter that maximizes the likelihood function based on the given data. In this case, using the sample of replacement times (19, 23, 21, 22, 24), the estimated parameter λ of the exponential distribution is calculated to be 0.050.

(b) Comparing the estimators obtained by the method of moments (L) and the method of maximum likelihood (M), we can determine the relationship between them. In general, the method of maximum likelihood tends to provide more efficient and precise estimators compared to the method of moments. Therefore, we have L < M, indicating that the estimator obtained by the method of maximum likelihood (M) is expected to be greater than the estimator obtained by the method of moments (L) in this situation.

To learn more about maximum likelihood (M), click here: brainly.com/question/30625970

#SPJ11

Answer:

-6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

No -6

Step-by-step explanation:

The integral of 8(3x - 2)³ dx is 2(3x - 2)⁴ + C, where C is the constant of integration.

To find the integral of 8(3x - 2)³ dx, we can apply the power rule of integration. According to the power rule, the integral of xⁿ dx is (xⁿ⁺¹ / (n + 1)) + C, where n is a constant and C is the constant of integration.

In this case, we have (3x - 2)³ as the integrand. We can rewrite it as 8(3x - 2)³ to simplify the expression. Since 8 is a constant multiplier, it can be factored out of the integral.

Using the power rule, we integrate each term separately. The integral of (3x - 2)³ is [(3x - 2)⁴ / 4] + C, where C is the constant of integration. Multiplying by the constant 8, we get 8[(3x - 2)⁴ / 4] + C.

Simplifying further, we can simplify the expression to 2(3x - 2)⁴ + C, where C is the constant of integration.

Therefore, the integral of 8(3x - 2)³ dx is 2(3x - 2)⁴ + C.

Learn more about integration here:

https://brainly.com/question/31744185

#SPJ11

side length of square=10

Now,

perimeter of square =4l

=4×10

=40m

Given:

The figure of a parallelogram.

To find:

The measure of angle Z.

Solution:

We know that, the consecutive interior angles of a parallelogram are supplementary angles, it means there sum is 180 degrees.

In the given figure angle W and angle Z are supplementary angle. So,

[tex]m\angle W+m\angle Z=180^\circ[/tex]

[tex](18b-11)^\circ+(9b+2)^\circ=180^\circ[/tex]

[tex](27b-9)^\circ=180^\circ[/tex]

[tex](27b-9)=180[/tex]

Adding 9 on both sides, we get

[tex]27b=180+9[/tex]

[tex]27b=189[/tex]

[tex]b=\dfrac{189}{27}[/tex]

[tex]b=7[/tex]

Now,

[tex]m\angle Z=(9b+2)^\circ[/tex]

[tex]m\angle Z=(9(7)+2)^\circ[/tex]

[tex]m\angle Z=(63+2)^\circ[/tex]

[tex]m\angle Z=65^\circ[/tex]

Therefore, the correct option is C.

Consider the inequality -20.2 > 0y. Which of the following must be true? Check all that apply.

You cannot divide by zero.

The inequality is equivalent to -20.2 > 0, which is false.

The solution is y > 0.

The solution is 0 > y.

The solution is y = 0.

Felipe's age is ≥ 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Difference of F's age and 4: f - 4

Twice: 2 (f -4) ≥ 2

2f - 8 ≥ 2

2f ≥ 10

f ≥ 5

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Side x = 2.12132 = 3√2/2

Step-by-step explanation:

I used a triangle calculator to find side x

The argument draws an analogy between car servicing and regular physicals for people over 40, highlighting the need for preventive care and maintenance. The deductive step is a valid syllogism with a universal major premise, and the inductive generalization is plausible given the potential benefits of regular check-ups, although individual circumstances may vary.

1) In this argument by analogy, two things are being compared: A) taking a car in for servicing every few months, and B) getting a physical every year for people over the age of 40. The property P attributed to B in the conclusion is the need for regular care or check-ups.

2) The unstated properties (S) that are supposed to make A and B similar include the idea that both cars and bodies require regular maintenance to ensure proper functioning and longevity. The argument assumes that just as neglecting car maintenance can lead to breakdowns and costly repairs, neglecting regular physical check-ups can lead to health problems and potential medical issues.

3) The deductive step of the argument can be formulated as follows:

Major premise: Cars need regular servicing to prevent breakdowns and maintain optimal performance.

Minor premise: Bodies are similar to cars in the sense that they require regular check-ups to prevent health issues and maintain optimal well-being.

Conclusion: People over the age of 40 should get a physical every year.

4) The inductive generalization in the argument relies on the plausibility of the comparison between car maintenance and physical check-ups. To evaluate its validity, we can consider the following:

a) The initial plausibility of the generalization: Given our knowledge that regular check-ups can help detect health problems early and promote overall well-being, it is reasonable to argue that regular physicals are beneficial, similar to regular car servicing.

b) Additional positive instances: We can find support for the generalization by examining medical recommendations and practices that emphasize the importance of regular check-ups for preventive care.

c) Counterexamples: While some individuals may not experience health issues or see the need for frequent physicals, the argument assumes that the general population will benefit from regular check-ups.

To know more about argument, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/9392384#

#SPJ11

Answer:

 25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2b^2 + 22

Step-by-step explanation:

2b(b + 11)

2b ×b + 2 × 11

2b^2 + 22

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a-4

Step-by-step explination:

hope this helps!

The dispersion of a Normal distribution is less dispersed than the T-distribution.

The dispersion of a distribution is measured by the standard deviation (or variance) of the distribution.

For a Normal distribution, the standard deviation is always known.

On the other hand, for a t-distribution, the standard deviation of the population is not known and is estimated using the sample standard deviation.

This means that the t-distribution has more uncertainty, which leads to more dispersion compared to the Normal distribution.

The t-distribution is often used when the sample size is small or when the population standard deviation is unknown. As the sample size increases, the t-distribution approaches the Normal distribution.

Therefore, for large sample sizes, both distributions become more or less similar.

In conclusion, the Normal distribution is less dispersed than the t-distribution.

To learn more about Normal distribution

https://brainly.com/question/12892403

#SPJ11