Please Please help me

Answer:

2.8 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

tan(29)=x/5

5tan(29)=x

2.8=x

Answer:

5.7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A.) The base is 5 and the exponent is 3

B.) The base is 4 the exponent is 7

C.) The base is 3 the exponent is 4

D.) The base is 6 the exponent is 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

answer is y = 3/4x - 5

Step-by-step explanation:

picture below.

The 3/4 comes from the line. You would use rise over run to find the slope, which in this case is 3/4. and the -5 is basically the y-intercept

Answer:

143 ft2

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula for parrallelogram: A= BxH

13x11= 143

Answer:

26 cents

Step-by-step explanation:

S0, lets just subtract the 10 by the 9.74 to get our answer:

10-9.74

=

0.26

So, lets remember that there are 100 cents in 1 dollar.

So 1 cent would be: 0.01

Our answer we got above is 0.26

So that must be 26 cents.

Answer:

26

Hope this helps! ;)

To find the value of the constant k, we need to integrate the probability density function (PDF) over its entire range and set it equal to 1, since the total area under the PDF should be 1.

(a) Calculating the value of the constant K:

∫[from -1 to 1] kx² dx = 1

Integrating, we get:

(k/3) [x³] from -1 to 1 = 1

(k/3)(1³ - (-1)³) = 1

(k/3)(1 + 1) = 1

(2k/3) = 1

2k = 3

k = 3/2

Therefore, the value of the constant k is 3/2.

(b) Calculating the mean and variance of X:

To find the mean (μ), we need to calculate the expected value of X. Since the PDF is symmetric around x = 0, the mean will be 0.

μ = 0

To find the variance (σ²), we need to calculate the second moment of X around its mean.

σ² = ∫[from -1 to 1] x² * f(x) dx

Substituting the PDF f(x) = (3/2)x²:

σ² = ∫[from -1 to 1] x² * (3/2)x² dx

σ² = (3/2) ∫[from -1 to 1] x^4 dx

σ² = (3/2) * (1/5) [x^5] from -1 to 1

σ² = (3/2) * (1/5) * (1^5 - (-1)^5)

σ² = (3/2) * (1/5) * (1 - (-1))

σ² = (3/2) * (1/5) * 2

σ² = 3/5

Therefore, the mean of X is 0, and the variance is 3/5.

(c) The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of X is found by integrating the PDF from negative infinity to x:

F(x) = ∫[from -∞ to x] f(t) dt

For the given PDF f(x) = (3/2)x², the cumulative distribution function can be calculated as follows:

F(x) = ∫[from -∞ to x] (3/2)t² dt

F(x) = (3/2) ∫[from -∞ to x] t² dt

F(x) = (3/2) * (1/3) [t³] from -∞ to x

F(x) = (1/2) x³

Therefore, the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of X is F(x) = (1/2) x³.

To know more about probability density function (PDF), refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32048774#

#SPJ11

The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = (s + 3)² (s + 5) is given by L⁻¹{F} = 1/2 * e^(-3t) - t * e^(-3t) + 1/2 * e^(-5t).

To determine the inverse Laplace transform of F(s) = (s + 3)² (s + 5), we can use the properties and formulas of Laplace transforms.

The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) can be obtained by applying partial fraction decomposition, followed by looking up the corresponding inverse Laplace transform in a table of Laplace transforms.

Let's first factorize F(s):

F(s) = (s + 3)² (s + 5)

Next, we perform partial fraction decomposition. We express F(s) as the sum of simpler fractions:

F(s) = A/(s + 3) + B/(s + 3)² + C/(s + 5)

To find the values of A, B, and C, we can equate the numerator of F(s) with the sum of the numerators in the partial fraction decomposition:

(s + 3)² (s + 5) = A(s + 3)(s + 5) + B(s + 5) + C(s + 3)²

Expanding the equations and collecting like terms, we get:

s² + 8s + 15 = (A + C)s² + (8A + 3C + B)s + (15A + 5B)

Equating the coefficients of the terms on both sides, we have the following system of equations:

A + C = 1

8A + 3C + B = 8

15A + 5B = 15

Solving this system of equations, we find A = 1/2, B = -1/2, and C = 1/2.

Now, we can rewrite F(s) in terms of the partial fractions:

F(s) = 1/2/(s + 3) + (-1/2)/(s + 3)² + 1/2/(s + 5)

Looking up the inverse Laplace transform of each term in the table, we find:

L⁻¹{1/2/(s + 3)} = 1/2 * e^(-3t)

L⁻¹{(-1/2)/(s + 3)²} = -t * e^(-3t)

L⁻¹{1/2/(s + 5)} = 1/2 * e^(-5t)

Therefore, the inverse Laplace transform of F(s) is:

L⁻¹{F} = 1/2 * e^(-3t) - t * e^(-3t) + 1/2 * e^(-5t)

This is the desired result for the inverse Laplace transform of F(s).

To learn more about inverse Laplace transform visit : https://brainly.com/question/27753787

#SPJ11

Answer:

volume in cubic centimeters = 30 cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

Ratio of mass to volume = 27 g : 10 cm³

what is the volume in cubic centimeters of the sample of metal if mass = 81 g

Let

volume in cubic centimeters = v

Ratio of mass to volume = 81 g : v

Equate both ratios

27 g : 10 cm³ = 81 g : v

27/10 = 81/v

Cross product

27 * v = 10 * 81

27v = 810

v = 810/27

v = 30 cm³

volume in cubic centimeters = 30 cm³

The margin of error for a 97% confidence interval for (p1 - p2) is 0.159.

To find the margin of error (E) for a 97% confidence interval for (p1 - p2), we can use the following formula:

E = Z * sqrt((p1 * (1 - p1) / n1) + (p2 * (1 - p2) / n2))

Where:

Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level. For a 97% confidence level, the z-score is approximately 2.170.

p1 and p2 are the sample proportions for populations 1 and 2, respectively.

n1 and n2 are the sample sizes for populations 1 and 2, respectively.

To calculate p1 and p2, we divide the sample counts (x1 and x2) by their respective sample sizes (n1 and n2).

p1 = x1 / n1 = 62 / 108 ≈ 0.574

p2 = x2 / n2 = 235 / 723 ≈ 0.325

Substituting the values into the formula, we have:

E = 2.170 * sqrt((0.574 * (1 - 0.574) / 108) + (0.325 * (1 - 0.325) / 723))

Calculating this expression, we find:

E ≈ 2.170 * sqrt(0.004957 + 0.000443)

≈ 2.170 * sqrt(0.005400)

≈ 2.170 * 0.073486

≈ 0.159

For more such question on error visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28771966

#SPJ8

Answer: a = -7.68

STEPS:

- Subtract 13.61 from both sides

- Simplify

- Divide both sides by 3

Answer:

1000

Step-by-step explanation:

volume of prism formula=b*w*h(base times width times height)

10*10*10(10^3)=1000

Answer: 1,000 m

Step-by-step explanation:

To find volume you have to multiply: LengthxWidth,Height so you would do 10x10x10 and get 1,000 m

HOPE THIS HELPS ^^

The probability that the event E does not happen is:

P(not E) = 0.61

First, remember that for any experiment with N outcomes, the sum of the N probabilities for these outcomes must be 1.

Then if we have two outcomes, E happens or E does not happen, we have:

P(E) + P(not E) = 1

Replace the value that we know:

0.39 + p(not E) = 1

Solve for the probability we want:

P(not E) = 1 - 0.39

P(not E) = 0.61

Learn more about probability at:

https://brainly.com/question/25870256

#SPJ4

Answer:

175

Step-by-step explanation:

140

140/4=35

140+35=175

Answer:

I cannot solve it step-by-step because like I'm helping other people cuz I'm busy with my homework so just I'm going to direct you the question you're supposed to solve simultaneous equation by any method example elimination method substitution method then you get the answer if you get stuck you can inform me

Answer:

the answer is X = 40 Y=50

Step-by-step explanation:

The required answer is The literature review should be completed before developing a research hypothesis or research questions for a quantitative study.

Explanation :

The role of literature review in the qualitative study.To examine the problem of attrition from an online doctoral program in a qualitative study, a literature review is essential to identifying the theoretical frameworks and practices for reducing attrition. Researchers need to review the current theories on student retention, persistence, and attrition to examine the factors contributing to these trends.

By reviewing related literature, researchers gain insight into how student attrition is approached in existing literature. Additionally, literature review helps in developing the research problem and objectives, identifying gaps in the current literature that the study can fill. This provides a solid foundation for conducting qualitative research and enables the researcher to identify the gaps and the direction the study should take.

When should you complete a literature review for a quantitative study?For a quantitative study of the factors that predict attrition from a doctoral program, a literature review should be completed before determining your research hypothesis or research questions.

A literature review is essential as it helps researchers to identify the current literature, theories, and research studies conducted in the area of attrition in doctoral programs.

By conducting a literature review, the researcher can identify gaps, inconsistencies, and areas that require more attention. This allows researchers to develop an appropriate research design, research questions, and hypotheses that address the identified gaps in the literature.

Thus, the literature review should be completed before developing a research hypothesis or research questions for a quantitative study.

Learn more about literature review here https://brainly.com/question/30509743

#SPJ11

Answer:

m = 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

slope of a line equation:

[tex]m = \frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}[/tex]

m = (3-0)/(2-(-2))

m = 3/4

Answer:

200

Step-by-step explanation:

15% is 0.15

0.15x = 30

x = 30/0.15 = 200

Answer: So, 8%3 = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

In the first question, based on the given regression equation, if a student spends 5 hours studying for a test, the predicted test score would be 50 + 7(5) = 85.

In the second question, the information provided is unclear and incomplete. The given text appears to contain multiple unrelated statements and lacks sufficient context or specific details to answer the question regarding the critical value for hypothesis testing.

1. For the first question, the regression equation is given as y = 50 + 7x, where y represents the test score and x represents the number of hours studied. To find the test score when a student spends 5 hours studying, we substitute x = 5 into the equation: y = 50 + 7(5) = 85.

2. However, the second question is unclear and does not provide sufficient information or context to determine the intended calculation or answer. It mentions something about applicant interviews, regression output, and ANOVA, but the information is not well-defined or organized. Without specific details and clear instructions, it is not possible to provide a meaningful response.

Learn more about hypothesis testing here: brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ11

Answer:

12 discs

Step-by-step explanation:

Sheet metal has dimensions of 56 cm by 33 cm. This indicates that it is a rectangle.

A_rectangle = length × width

A_rect = 56 × 33

A_rect = 1848 cm²

It is now melt down and recast into disc's of 7 cm radius and similar thickness.

Thus;

Area of one disc = πr² = π × 7² = 49π

Thus,number of disc's cast = 1848/49π

number of disc's cast = 12

Answer:

x = 6

11/2x + 2/3x = 37

37/6x = 37

Step-by-step explanation:

these are correct since when you evaluate the equation, you only get 6 being the value for x. And all these three options I wrote above lead to x = 6

Hope this helped :)

Answer:

We can use the formula for the nth term of an arithmetic sequence to find n:

an = a1 + (n - 1)d

Substituting the given values, we get:

52 = 132 + (n - 1)(-4)

Simplifying and solving for n, we get:

n = 21

So, the sequence has 21 terms.

We can use the formula for the sum of the first n terms of an arithmetic sequence to find Sn:

Sn = n/2(2a1 + (n - 1)d)

Substituting the given values, we get:

Sn = 21/2(2(132) + (21 - 1)(-4))

Simplifying, we get:

Sn = 21/2(264 - 80)

Sn = 21/2(184)

Sn = 1932

Therefore, the sum of the first 21 terms of the arithmetic sequence is 1932.

Answer:

B. Ten less than five times a number is greater than twenty-six.

Step-by-step explanation:

Isolate the variable by dividing each side by factors that don't contain the variable.

Inequality Form:

n > 36 /5

Interval Notation:

( 36 /5 , ∞ )

Answer:

a)b=4

b)x=-9

c)r=6

Step-by-step explanation:

Question 2.

a)5b+6=26

5b=26-6

5b=20

b=4

b)6-x=15

-x=15-6

-x=9

x=-9

c)r/2+2=5

r/2=5-2

r/2=3

Multiply both sides by 2 to remain with r

r/2×2=3×2

r=6.

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

By multiplying each ratio by the second number of the other ratio, you can determine if they are equivalent.