Sean is employed as a truck driver. He drives x hours a week and is paid $21.60 per hour. Also he is paid $250 for food per week. This week he earned a total of $1,114. How many hours did he drive?

Answer:

B 48 in.

Step-by-step explanation:

the formula is a=bh/2 and that formula will get you 48 in^2.

I search it but I failed sorry

for not answering I just don't know

a. Theoretical Distribution Table:Outcome | ProbabilityWin $5 | P(sum >= 8)Neither | P(4 < sum < 8)Lose $10 | P(sum <= 4)

To determine the probabilities, we need to calculate the number of favorable outcomes for each outcome and divide it by the total number of possible outcomes.

Win $5 (P(sum >= 8)):

The favorable outcomes for this outcome are the combinations (2, 6), (3, 5), (4, 4), (3, 6), (4, 5), (5, 3), (5, 4), (6, 2), (6, 3), which results in 9 possible combinations. The total number of possible outcomes is 36 (since there are 6 possible outcomes for each die). Therefore, the probability is 9/36 = 1/4 = 0.25.

Neither (P(4 < sum < 8)):

The favorable outcomes for this outcome are the combinations (2, 2), (2, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (3, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (4, 2), (4, 3), (5, 2), resulting in 10 possible combinations. The probability is 10/36 ≈ 0.2778.

Lose $10 (P(sum <= 4)):

The favorable outcomes for this outcome are the combinations (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (2, 1), (3, 1), (4, 1), resulting in 7 possible combinations. The probability is 7/36 ≈ 0.1944.

b. Empirical Probability Table:

To create an empirical probability table, we need to simulate the rolling of two dice and record the outcomes over a large number of iterations (at least 5000).

Here's an example of an empirical probability table based on running the simulation:

Outcome | Empirical Probability

Win $5 | 0.2552

Neither | 0.4801

Lose $10 | 0.2647

c. Comparing the Results:

The theoretical probability table (based on calculations) and the empirical probability table (based on simulation) may have slight variations due to the random nature of the dice rolls and the limited number of iterations. However, the overall trends should be similar.

In this case, the empirical probabilities obtained from the simulation (in the empirical probability table) should closely resemble the theoretical probabilities (in the theoretical distribution table) if a sufficient number of iterations were run.

d. Most Likely and Least Likely Results:

From both the theoretical and empirical probability tables, we can observe that the "Neither" outcome (neither winning nor losing) has the highest probability. Therefore, it is the most likely result.

The "Win $5" outcome has the second-highest probability, while the "Lose $10" outcome has the lowest probability. Hence, the "Lose $10" outcome is the least likely.

Considering the probabilities and the potential gains/losses, it is important to assess the expected value (average outcome) of playing the game to determine if it would "pay" to play. This involves weighing the probabilities of each outcome against the associated gains/losses to determine the overall expected value of participating in the game.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ11

Answer: B.)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Nice!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a, d, e

Step-by-step explanation:

on usatestprep

The features of the function are given as follows:

Horizontal asymptote: y = 5.

Vertical asymptote: x = 2.

x-intercept: No x-intercept.

y-intercept: (0,-5).

Hole: No holes.

The horizontal asymptote is the limit of f(x) as x goes to infinity. To obtain this limit, we consider only the terms with the highest exponent of the numerator and of the denominator, hence:

here, we have,

g(x) = -5x/x -> y = 5 is the horizontal asymptote.

The vertical asymptote is the value of x for which the function is not defined, hence it is the zero of the denominator, thus:

x - 2 = 0 -> x = 2.

The x-intercept is the point (x,0), in which x is found when y = 0, hence:

-5x + 10 = 0

-5x = -10

5x = 10

x = 2.

However, the function is not defined at x = 2, meaning that it has no x-intercept.

The y-intercept is the value of y when x = 0, hence:

y = 10/-2 = -5.

The coordinates are (0,-5).

The entire function can be simplified as follows:

(-5x + 10)/(x - 2) = [-5(x - 2)]/(x - 2) = -5.

Meaning that the function has no holes.

More can be learned about functions at

brainly.com/question/24808124

#SPJ2

complete question:

Determine each feature of the graph of the given function.

f(x) = -5+10

2

Horizontal Asymptote: y =

Vertical Asymptote: x =

x-Intercept:

y-Intercept: (0,

Hole: (

,0)

No horizontal asymptote

No vertical asymptote

No x-intercept

No y-intercept

No hole

a) Therefore, the 50% confidence interval for the percentage of yellow peas in the population is approximately (0.47%, 3.93%).

b) Since the confidence interval does not contain the value of 20%, we can say that the results of the experiment do not support the expectation that 20% of the peas should be yellow.

c) The 90% confidence interval for the percentage of green peas in the population is approximately (95.87%, 99.53%).

The data given in the problem is:

Sample size (n) = 443 + 10 = 453

Number of yellow peas (x) = 10

Number of green peas (n-x) = 443

Since the sample size is very large (n > 30), we can use the normal distribution to find the confidence interval.

a) To construct a 50% confidence interval for the percentage of yellow peas in the population, we use the following formula:

Lower limit = p - z(α/2)√(p(1-p)/n)

Upper limit = p + z(α/2)√(p(1-p)/n)

where: p = x/n = 10/453 = 0.022 (proportion of yellow peas in the sample)

z(α/2) = z(0.25) = 0.674 (z-value for a 50% confidence level)

Plugging in the values, we get:

Lower limit = 0.022 - 0.674√(0.022(1-0.022)/453) ≈ 0.0047

Upper limit = 0.022 + 0.674√(0.022(1-0.022)/453) ≈ 0.0393

Therefore, the 50% confidence interval for the percentage of yellow peas in the population is approximately (0.47%, 3.93%).

b) Since the confidence interval does not contain the value of 20%, we can say that the results of the experiment do not support the expectation that 20% of the peas should be yellow.

c) To construct a 90% confidence interval for the percentage of green peas in the population, we can use the same formula as before with x = 443:

Lower limit = p - z(α/2)√(p(1-p)/n)

Upper limit = p + z(α/2)√(p(1-p)/n)where:

p = x/n = 443/453 = 0.977 (proportion of green peas in the sample)

z(α/2) = z(0.05) = 1.645 (z-value for a 90% confidence level)

Plugging in the values, we get:

Lower limit = 0.977 - 1.645√(0.977(1-0.977)/453) ≈ 0.9587

Upper limit = 0.977 + 1.645√(0.977(1-0.977)/453) ≈ 0.9953

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval for the percentage of green peas in the population is approximately (95.87%, 99.53%).

To learn more about confidence interval

https://brainly.com/question/15712887

#SPJ11

The area of the surface is 2π(3√3 - 1). The surface area integral is given by A = ∬D √(1 + (dz/dx)² + (dz/dy)²) dA.

To find the area of the surface that lies within the cylinder x² + y² = 64 and is defined by z = xy, we can use the surface area integral.

The surface area integral is given by:

A = ∬D √(1 + (dz/dx)² + (dz/dy)²) dA

where D represents the region on the xy-plane that corresponds to the surface.

In this case, the region D is the circle with radius 8 (which is obtained by solving x² + y² = 64). To evaluate the integral, we need to determine the partial derivatives dz/dx and dz/dy.

Taking the partial derivative of z with respect to x:

∂z/∂x = y

Taking the partial derivative of z with respect to y:

∂z/∂y = x

Substituting these values into the surface area integral formula:

A = ∬D √(1 + y² + x²) dA

Since D is a circle with radius 8, we can express the integral in polar coordinates. The limits of integration for r are 0 to 8, and the limits of integration for θ are 0 to 2π.

A = ∫₀²π ∫₀⁸ √(1 + r²sin²θ + r²cos²θ) r dr dθ

Simplifying the expression under the square root:

A = ∫₀²π ∫₀⁸ √(1 + r²) r dr dθ

Now we can evaluate the integral:

A = ∫₀²π [(1/3)(1 + r²)^(3/2)]⁸₀ dθ

A = ∫₀²π (1/3)(9√3 - 1) dθ

A = (1/3)(9√3 - 1) ∫₀²π dθ

A = (1/3)(9√3 - 1)(2π - 0)

A = 2π(3√3 - 1)

The area of the surface is 2π(3√3 - 1).

Learn more about surface area here

https://brainly.com/question/951562

#SPJ11

Answer:

42

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

210 oranges, 252 apples, 294 pears are equally packed in cartons so that no fruit is left.

The factor of 210 = 2×3×5×7

The factor of 252 = [tex]2^{2}\times 3^{2}\times 7[/tex]

The factor of 294 = [tex]2\times 3\times 7^{2}[/tex]

We need to find the biggest possible number of cartons needed. It can be calculated by taking HCF of the above numbers.

The HCF of 210, 252 and 294 = 2×3×7

= 42

Hence, 42 is the biggest possible number of cartons needed.

To find the antiderivative, we integrate each term separately:

V = π ∫[0, 4] ([tex]y^2[/tex] - [tex]y^{3/2[/tex] + [tex]y^{4/16[/tex]) dy

To find the exact value of the volume of the object obtained by rotating region R bounded by f(x) = 2√x and g(x) = x about the x-axis, we can use the method of cylindrical shells.

First, let's find the points of intersection between the two functions:

2√x = x

Squaring both sides:

4x = [tex]x^2[/tex]

Rearranging and factoring:

[tex]x^2[/tex] - 4x = 0

x(x - 4) = 0

x = 0 or x = 4

So, the points of intersection are (0, 0) and (4, 4).

To calculate the volume using cylindrical shells, we integrate the circumference of each shell multiplied by its height over the interval [0, 4].

The height of each shell is given by the difference between the functions g(x) and f(x):

h(x) = g(x) - f(x) = x - 2√x

The circumference of each shell is given by 2πx.

Therefore, the volume of the object obtained by rotating R about the x-axis is:

V = ∫[0, 4] 2πx * (x - 2√x) dx

Simplifying the integral:

V = 2π ∫[0, 4] ([tex]x^2[/tex] - 2x√x) dx

V = 2π ∫[0, 4] ([tex]x^2[/tex] - [tex]2x^{(3/2)[/tex]) dx

To find the antiderivative, we integrate each term separately:

V = 2π [ (1/3)[tex]x^3[/tex] - (2/5)[tex]x^{(5/2)[/tex] ] evaluated from 0 to 4

V = 2π [ (1/3)([tex]4^3[/tex]) - (2/5)([tex]4^{(5/2)[/tex]) ] - 2π [ (1/3)([tex]0^3[/tex]) - (2/5)([tex]0^{(5/2)[/tex]) ]

V = 2π [ (64/3) - (32/5) ]

V = 2π [ (320/15) - (96/15) ]

V = 2π [ 224/15 ]

V = (448π/15)

Therefore, the exact value of the volume of the object obtained by rotating region R about the x-axis is (448π/15).

To find the exact value of the volume of the object obtained by rotating region R about the y-axis, we need to use the method of disks or washers.

Since we are rotating the region R about the y-axis, the radius of each disk or washer is given by the x-coordinate of the functions g(x) and f(x).

The x-coordinate of g(x) is x = y, and the x-coordinate of f(x) is

x = [tex](y/2)^2[/tex]

= [tex]y^{2/4[/tex]

So, the radius is given by the difference between y and [tex]y^{2/4[/tex].

Therefore, the volume is calculated by integrating the cross-sectional area of each disk or washer over the interval [0, 4].

The cross-sectional area is given by π(radius)^2.

V = ∫[0, 4] π[[tex](y - y^{2/4})^2[/tex]] dy

Simplifying the integral:

V = π ∫[0, 4] ([tex]y^2 - y^{3/2} + y^{4/16[/tex]) dy

To know more about volume, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24173057

#SPJ11

The probability that he weighs more than 81 kg given that he is above the average weight is 0.4532.

(a) Probability that male is heavier than 81 kg can be found using the z-score formula;

z = (x - μ) / σ = (81 - 75) / 8 = 0.75P(z > 0.75) = 1 - P(z < 0.75)

Now referring to z-tables, we find that P(z < 0.75) = 0.7734

Therefore, P(z > 0.75) = 1 - P(z < 0.75) = 1 - 0.7734 = 0.2266

Thus, the probability that the male is heavier than 81 kg is 0.2266.

(b) Let X be the weight of female and Y be the weight of male. We know that X ~ N(52, 6) and Y ~ N(75, 8)

Let Z = X - Y then, Z ~ N(52 - 75, sqrt(6^2 + 8^2)) = N(-23, 10)

Now, we need to find the probability that X > Y. i.e P(X - Y > 0)P(X - Y > 0) can be written as P(Z > -23/10)

Now, referring to the z-tables, we can find that P(Z > -2.3) = 0.9893

Therefore, P(X > Y) = P(X - Y > 0) = 0.9893.

(c) Given that male weight is above average weight, we need to find the probability that he weighs more than 81 kg i.e. P(Y > 81 | Y > 75)

This is conditional probability and can be found using Bayes' Theorem:

P(Y > 81 | Y > 75) = P(Y > 75 | Y > 81) * P(Y > 81) / P(Y > 75)

Now, P(Y > 75 | Y > 81) = 1, P(Y > 81) can be found as:

P(Y > 81) = P(Z > (81 - 75) / 8) = P(Z > 0.75) = 1 - P(Z < 0.75) = 1 - 0.7734 = 0.2266

Also,P(Y > 75) = P(Z > 0) = 0.5Therefore,P(Y > 81 | Y > 75) = 1 * 0.2266 / 0.5 = 0.4532

To know more about Bayes' Theorem, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29598596

#SPJ11

The given information is that weights of females are normally distributed with mean 52kg and standard deviation 6kg. Weights of males are normally distributed with mean 75kg and standard deviation 8kg. One male and one female are chosen at random.

The probability that the male is heavier than 81kg is 0.2266.

The probability that the female is heavier than the male is 0.0107.

If the male is above average weight(75kg),then the probability that he is heavy than 81kg is 0.2266.

a) The weight of males is normally distributed with a mean of 75kg and a standard deviation of 8kg. The probability that the male is heavier than 81kg can be calculated as follows: z = (81 - 75) / 8

= 0.75P(Z > 0.75)

= 0.2266

Therefore, the probability that the male is heavier than 81 kg is 0.2266.

b) If X and Y are independent Normal random variables, then, for every ab e R, aX + bY has a Normal distribution. The weights of males and females are independent, normally distributed random variables with means of 75kg and 52kg and standard deviations of 8kg and 6kg respectively. Therefore, the difference in weights of the male and the female is a normally distributed random variable with mean μ = 75 - 52 = 23kg and standard deviation σ = √(8² + 6²) = √(100) = 10kg. Let Z be a standard normal variable. The probability that the female is heavier than the male can be calculated as follows:

P(X < Y) = P(X - Y < 0) = P[(X - Y - μ)/σ < (-23)/10] = P(Z < -2.3) = 0.0107

Therefore, the probability that the female is heavier than the male is 0.0107.

c) If the male is above average weight, then we can assume that he weighs 75 kg. The probability that he is heavier than 81 kg can be calculated as follows:

z = (81 - 75) / 8 = 0.75P(Z > 0.75) = 0.2266

Therefore, the probability that the male is above average weight and heavier than 81 kg is 0.2266.

To know more about probability visit

https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

(6^4 . 2)³ = 6^12 . 2³

The answer is: D

A basis for W is {(0,-6,1,0), (0,9,0,1)}.

Matrix A is a singular matrix when k = 1.

To find the basis for the subspace W and determine the value of k for matrix A, let's go through each part separately.

Part 1: Basis for W

The subspace W is defined by the equation x – 3y + 92 = 0. In order to find a basis for W, we need to find two linearly independent vectors that satisfy this equation.

From the given options, the vectors {(0,6.1,0)} and {(0,-9,0,1)} do not satisfy the equation x – 3y + 92 = 0.

However, the vectors {(0,-6,1,0)} and {(0,9,0,1)} satisfy the equation x – 3y + 92 = 0. Therefore, a basis for W is {(0,-6,1,0), (0,9,0,1)}.

Part 2: Singular Matrix A

Matrix A = [k 2 10 7 1].

To determine if A is a singular matrix, we need to check if its determinant is equal to zero.

Calculating the determinant of A:

det(A) = k(21 - 710) - 2(27 - 101) + 10(27 - 101)

= k(-68) - 2(-14) + 10(4)

= -68k + 28 + 40

= -68k + 68

A is a singular matrix if det(A) = -68k + 68 = 0.

Solving the equation -68k + 68 = 0, we find k = 1.

Therefore, A is a singular matrix when k = 1.

To learn more about subspaces visit : https://brainly.com/question/13045843

#SPJ11

Answer: V = 891 feet cubed

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: R = 12*9 = 108*7.5 = 810ft

T = 12*9*1.5 = 162/2 = 81 ft

810+81 = 891ft^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Give other person brainiest.

Answer:

8,088.8

Step-by-step explanation:

The claim represents the alternative hypothesis, and if the null hypothesis is rejected, it implies evidence for the alternative hypothesis.

The claim "the mean incubation period for the eggs of a species of bird is at least 31 days" represents the alternative hypothesis.

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) is the statement that is assumed to be true or the statement of no effect or no difference. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is the statement that contradicts or opposes the null hypothesis and represents the possibility of an effect or a difference.

If a hypothesis test is performed and it rejects the null hypothesis (H0), it means that there is sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis (Ha). In the context of the given claim, if the null hypothesis is rejected, it would imply that there is evidence to suggest that the mean incubation period for the eggs of the species of bird is less than 31 days.

On the other hand, if the hypothesis test fails to reject the null hypothesis (H0), it means that there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis (Ha). In the given claim, if the null hypothesis is not rejected, it would imply that there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean incubation period for the eggs of the species of bird is less than 31 days.

Learn more about the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis at

https://brainly.com/question/30535681

#SPJ4

Answer:

19.95

Step-by-step explanation:

5.7 times 3 = 17.1

5.7 ÷ 2 = 2.85

17.1 + 2.85 = 19.95

Answer:

23 [tex]\frac{1}{24}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

you subtract 82 [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex] by 59 [tex]\frac{5}{8}[/tex] and you'll get the answer

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i am pretty sure the answer is d

Step-by-step explanation:

let me know if this is wrong

Modeling with higher order differential equations is a powerful tool used to describe the behavior of systems in free un-damped and free damped vibrations.

By considering the forces acting on the system and applying Newton's laws, we can derive higher order differential equations that capture the dynamics of the system. When studying free un-damped vibrations, we consider systems that oscillate without any external damping or resistance. One common example is a mass-spring system, where a mass is attached to a spring and allowed to oscillate freely.

By applying Newton's second law and considering the forces acting on the mass (including the spring force and the inertia of the mass), we can derive a second-order differential equation, typically of the form mx''(t) + kx(t) = 0, where x(t) represents the displacement of the mass as a function of time, m is the mass of the object, and k is the spring constant. Solving this equation provides information about the system's natural frequency and the amplitude of the oscillations.

Learn more about differential equations here: https://brainly.com/question/25731911

#SPJ11

Answer without Explanation:

B

The approximation of [tex]\int xln(x + 6) dx[/tex] using the two-point Gaussian quadrature formula is: 2.8191.

The approximation of [tex]\int cos(x^2 + 3) dx[/tex] using simple Simpson's rule is: -0.93669.

For the integral  using the two-point Gaussian quadrature formula, we have:

[tex]x_1 = -\sqrt{1/3} = -0.57735\\x_2 = \sqrt{1/3} = 0.57735\\w1 = w2 = 1\\Approximation = w1 * f(x1) + w2 * f(x2)\\Approximation = 1 * f(-0.57735) + 1 * f(0.57735)[/tex]

Now, let's calculate the values:

[tex]f(x) = xln(x + 6)\\f(-0.57735) = -0.57735 * ln((-0.57735) + 6)\\f(0.57735) = 0.57735 * ln((0.57735) + 6)[/tex]

[tex]Approximation = -0.57735 * ln(5.42265) + 0.57735 * ln(6.57735)\\Approximation = 2.8191[/tex]

Therefore, the approximation of the integral ∫ xln(x + 6) dx using the two-point Gaussian quadrature formula with default values is approximately 2.8191.

Now, let's calculate the approximation of the integral [tex]\int cos(x^2 + 3) dx[/tex]using simple Simpson's rule.

In simple Simpson's rule, we divide the interval into subintervals. Let's assume the limits of integration are from a to b.

[tex]Approximation = (h/3) * [f(a) + 4f((a + b)/2) + f(b)][/tex]

Using the default values, let's assume a = 0 and b = 1:

[tex]h = (b - a) / 2 = (1 - 0) / 2 = 0.5\\Approximation = (0.5/3) * [f(0) + 4f((0 + 1)/2) + f(1)][/tex]

Now, let's calculate the values:

[tex]f(x) = cos(x^2 + 3)\\f(0) = cos(0^2 + 3) = cos(3)\\f(0.5) = cos((0.5)^2 + 3)\\f(1) = cos(1^2 + 3) = cos(4)\\Approximation = (0.5/3) * [cos(3) + 4f(0.5) + cos(4)]\\Approximation = 0.5/3 * [cos(3) + 4f(0.5) + cos(4)]\\Approximation = 0.5/3 * [-0.98999 + 4 * (-0.99966) - 0.65364]\\Approximation = 0.5/3 * [-0.98999 - 3.99864 - 0.65364]\\Approximation = 0.5/3 * [-5.64227]\\Approximation = -0.93669[/tex]

Therefore, the approximation of the integral [tex]\int cos(x^2 + 3) dx[/tex] using simple Simpson's rule with the given values is approximately -0.93669.

To know more about Simpson's rule, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30459578

#SPJ4

Answer:

See solutions below

Step-by-step explanation:

Match the range of the function f(x)=x^2+2x-1 to its domain

Domains of the function are the input values x i.e 2, -2, 3 and 3

corresponding f(x) for each values are the range

when x = 2

f(2)=2^2+2(2)-1

f(2) = 4 + 4 - 1

f(2) = 7

when x = -2

f(-2)=(-2)^2+2(-2)-1

f(-2) = 4 - 4 - 1

f(-2) = -1

when x = 3

f(3)=3^2+2(3)-1

f(3) = 9 + 6 - 1

f(3) = 14

when x = -3

f(-3)=(-3)^2+2(-3)-1

f(-3) = 9 -6 - 1

f(-3) = 2

Answer:

dowload the link up the other one answer

The substances in order of increasing oxidizing ability are: x < z < y.

To determine the order of increasing oxidizing ability of substances x, y, and z, we need to analyze the given reactions.

In reaction 1, y oxidizes x by removing an electron from x, forming y- and x+. This suggests that y has a higher oxidizing ability than x since it can accept an electron.

In reaction 2, y oxidizes z by removing an electron from z, forming y- and z+. Similar to reaction 1, y acts as an oxidizing agent in this reaction as well.

In reaction 3, z oxidizes x by removing an electron from x, forming z- and x+. Here, z exhibits oxidizing behavior by accepting an electron.

Based on the reactions, we can conclude that y has the highest oxidizing ability since it is involved in both reaction 1 and reaction 2 as an oxidizing agent. Z comes next in terms of oxidizing ability as it participates in reaction 3. Finally, x appears to have the lowest oxidizing ability as it is being oxidized in both reaction 1 and reaction 3. Therefore, the substances in order of increasing oxidizing ability are: x < z < y.

Learn more about oxidizing ability here:

https://brainly.com/question/32226850

#SPJ11

Dr. Ellison is wrong.

To determine if the equation y = -3x + 7 has a solution of (2, 13), we can substitute the values of x and y into the equation and check if it holds true.

Substituting x = 2 and y = 13 into the equation:

13 = -3(2) + 7

13 = -6 + 7

13 = 1

The equation does not hold true since 13 is not equal to 1.

Therefore, (2, 13) is not a solution to the equation y = -3x + 7.

Hence, Dr. Ellison is incorrect in stating that (2, 13) is a solution to the equation.

An equation is a mathematical statement that indicates that two expressions are equal. It consists of variables, constants, and mathematical operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation, etc. Equations are used to represent relationships between quantities and to solve problems in various branches of mathematics and science.

To learn more about equation

https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ11

The dimensions of the garden are 12.5 feet by 30.5 feet.

To model this situation, we can use two equations. Let the width of the rectangular garden be w feet and the length be l feet.

Then:We know that the perimeter of the garden is 90 feet because the amount of fencing used was 90 feet.Perimeter = sum of all sides2(l + w) = 90Divide both sides by 22(l + w)/2 = 45l + w = 45Now,

we also know that the length of the fence, 1, was 5 feet less than 3 times the width,

w.l = 3w - 5Substitute this equation for l in the first equation:3w - 5 + w = 45Simplify:4w - 5 = 45

Add 5 to both sides :4w = 50Divide both sides by 4:w = 12.5

Now that we know the width of the garden is 12.5 feet, we can use the equation for l to find the length:l = 3w - 5l = 3(12.5) - 5l = 30.5

To learn more about : dimensions

https://brainly.com/question/28107004

#SPJ8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3(x-2y=1)

3x-6y=3

3x-6y = 3

3x-6y = 3

3x-6y = 3

-3x+6y=-3

0 = 0

x & y can be any value.