Answer:
declare laws unconstitutional
What contribution to modern science was made by Andreas Vesalius?
a. He created a vaccination that helped reduce the death rate across Europe in the 16th century.
b. He published On the Structure of the Human Body which became the foundation of modern anatomy.
c. He is considered to be the founder of physiology due to his extensive research on circulation.
d. He wrote public letters condemning the Church for its non-acceptance of early scientific thought.
What did Newton's book Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy argue about the role of mathematics in understanding the natural world?
a. Newton's book argued that mathematics and physical science were separate and could not explain each other.
b. Newton's book argued that gravity could not be explained by mathematics alone.
c. Newton's book made the bold argument that physical science required the use of faith to understand the natural world.
d. Newton's book argued that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world.
How did the Renaissance rediscovery of the work of Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy help start the Scientific Revolution?
a. Ptolemy's system no longer seemed to work with what scientists were observing, and scientists began to look for other theories.
b. Scientists were forbidden to read Ptolemy.
c. Scientists wanted to prove that Ptolemy's theory of the universe was correct.
d. Scientists discovered new writing by Ptolemy.
Contribution to modern science was made by Andreas Vesalius b. He published On the Structure of the Human Body which became the foundation of modern anatomy. Newton's book Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy argue d. that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world. The Renaissance rediscovery of the work of Egyptian astronomer a. Ptolemy's system no longer seemed to work with what scientists were observing, and scientists began to look for other theories.
Andreas Vesalius, who was an anatomist and physician, contributed to modern science through his work on the human body's structure.
Vesalius published his work On the Structure of the Human Body, which is considered to be the foundation of modern anatomy, option B.
In this book, he refuted earlier teachings about the human body's structure, mainly those of Galen.
He emphasized that the human body's structure could be learned through dissection and direct observation.
In the 16th century, the vaccination that helped reduce the death rate across Europe was created by Edward Jenner.
Therefore, option A is not correct.
Vesalius is not considered to be the founder of physiology.
Though he contributed significantly to the field of physiology, this title is usually given to a German physiologist named Albrecht von Haller.
Hence, option C is incorrect.
Vesalius wrote public letters criticizing the Church for its non-acceptance of early scientific thought, but this is not his significant contribution to modern science.
Therefore, option D is incorrect.
The book Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy was written by Isaac Newton.
It argued that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world, option D.
According to Newton, mathematics was an essential tool for unlocking the secrets of the universe, including gravity, the motions of planets, and the properties of light.
Therefore, options A, B, and C are incorrect.
The Renaissance rediscovery of the work of Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy helped start the Scientific Revolution because Ptolemy's system no longer seemed to work with what scientists were observing, and scientists began to look for other theories, option A.
During this period, there were significant developments in various fields, including astronomy, physics, and mathematics.
Therefore, options B, C, and D are incorrect.
For more questions on Newton
https://brainly.com/question/12896892
#SPJ8
which groups made up the republican party and what was the party's major goal?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Republican Party in the United States was primarily composed of various groups, including former Whigs, anti-slavery activists, and northern Democrats. Its major goal was to halt the spread of slavery and ultimately abolish it. Founded in the mid-1850s, the party sought to unite individuals and factions who were against the expansion of slavery into new territories.
Through their advocacy for free soil, economic development, and moral opposition to slavery, the Republicans played a crucial role in the lead-up to the American Civil War and the eventual emancipation of enslaved people.
hope it helps!
Which of the following was not a reason for the War of 1812?
a. British impressment of American sailors
b. American expansionist ambitions
c. British support for Native American tribes
d. American desire to gain territory from Canada
The correct option that is not a reason for the War of 1812 is the option d. American desire to gain territory from Canada.
Explanation: War of 1812 was fought between the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, as well as its colonies, including Canada. The war began on June 18, 1812, and ended on February 18, 1815. The conflict arose primarily due to trade restrictions, British impressment of American sailors, American expansionist ambitions, and territorial expansionism, and other causes. The following are the reasons for the War of 1812: a. British impressment of American sailors. American expansionist ambitions c. British support for Native American tribes d. American desire to gain territory from Canada The option d. American desire to gain territory from Canada was not a reason for the War of 1812.
The War of 1812 was a conflict between the United States of America and Great Britain, which took place from 1812 to 1815. Despite its name, the war lasted for more than two years and extended beyond 1812.
To get more information about War of 1812 visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13899658
#SPJ11
Why might King Lo Bengula feel he was tricked into signing the contract?
King Lo Bengula of the Ndebele people in southern Africa might have felt he was tricked into signing the contract with Cecil Rhodes in 1888 because of several reasons.
One of the reasons was that King Lo Bengula was not very familiar with the European way of negotiating and was probably unaware of the legal consequences of signing the contract.
Another reason was that the English text of the agreement and the Ndebele language version differed greatly in their content and interpretation of the terms of the contract.
The Ndebele language version contained much broader and vague terms than the English version which limited the power and authority of the king.
As a result, King Lo Bengula may have believed that he had agreed to a far more limited concession than he had actually signed up for.
King Lo Bengula may have also been deceived by his own advisors, who may have failed to warn him of the true nature of the agreement.
Therefore, due to all these reasons, King Lo Bengula might have felt he was tricked into signing the contract
For more questions on King Lo Bengula
https://brainly.com/question/2986730
#SPJ8
Answer:
As a response from the queen's advisor, Lobengula was told it was "impossible for them to exclude white men". Lobengula informed Queen Victoria he and his Indunas would recognize the contract as they believe he was tricked.
which site is believed to have been the site of an ancient elite burial and shrine? a. blombos cave c. igbo ukwu
Answer:c. Igbo Ukwu
Explanation: Igbo-Ukwu is a city located in the state of Anambra. It is an important archaeological site, as it was a civilization that developed in eastern Nigeria between the 9th and 10th centuries. It is characterized by its work in copper (from the Aïr Mountains) and bronze. Discovered accidentally in 1938 by a resident who was digging a well, it cannot be linked to any other culture in the region, but it reveals the existence of a powerful and refined kingdom.
The site believed to have been the site of an ancient elite burial and shrine is Igbo-Ukwu.
Igbo-Ukwu is a town in southeastern Nigeria known for its rich archaeological heritage. It was discovered that the community had been established around 800 AD and existed till the 9th century AD. Igbo-Ukwu is one of the significant archeological sites in Nigeria and Africa.
Its famous discoveries include exotic copper artifacts such as intricately decorated staffs, crowns, pendants, breastplates, and jewelry, among others. These objects are believed to have been used for the burial of the ancient elite. The discoveries are dated between the 9th century AD and 10th century AD.
To learn more about elite, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30396807
#SPJ11
why the industrial revolution didn't happen in china answers
Answer:
The reasons for why the Industrial Revolution did not occur in China are complex and multifaceted. Some possible factors that may have contributed to this include a lack of infrastructure, political instability, a strong agricultural tradition, limited access to resources, and cultural factors. While some historians argue that China did experience some form of industrialization during the Ming and Qing dynasties, it did not lead to the same level of economic and social transformation as the Industrial Revolution in the West.
The Industrial Revolution didn't occur in that frame of mind because of a mix of internal and external factors. These elements incorporate China's customary agrarian economy, political and social unsteadiness, neutralist arrangements, and absence of innovative head-ways.
China had a long history of being an agrarian culture, with horticulture filling in as the pillar of the economy. This emphasis on farming obstructed the improvement of industrialization, as there was restricted speculation and framework in assembling and mechanical progressions.
Political and social unsteadiness in China during the hour of the modern upheaval additionally presented huge difficulties. Continuous contentions, dynastic changes, and inner battles for control redirected assets and consideration from modern turn of events. China's neutralist approaches, like the limitation of unfamiliar exchange and impact, further restricted openness to outside thoughts, advances, and capital that might have animated industrialization.
Besides, China lingered behind in mechanical head-ways contrasted with nations like England, which were at the very front of industrialization. The shortfall of essential developments and advancements, like the steam motor, automated material creation, and productive transportation frameworks, blocked the rise of a modern upset in China.
To learn more about Industrial Revolution,
https://brainly.com/question/26817561
which is not a feature of an ideal ruler in confucianism? responses literary knowledge literary knowledge a sense of tradition a sense of tradition absolute power absolute power a moral example
An ideal ruler in Confucianism does not possess the feature of absolute power. Confucianism emphasizes the importance of benevolent governance.
Confucianism promotes the idea of a virtuous ruler who governs with wisdom and compassion. Literary knowledge is considered essential for a ruler to make informed decisions and lead effectively. By studying classical texts and engaging in intellectual pursuits, the ruler gains knowledge and wisdom to guide their governance. Furthermore, a sense of tradition is valued in Confucianism, as it provides a framework for ethical behavior and social harmony. The ruler's adherence to traditional values and customs fosters stability and continuity in society.
Moreover, the ideal ruler in Confucianism is expected to serve as a moral example. Confucius believed that a ruler's virtuous conduct would inspire and guide the people towards ethical behavior. By embodying moral virtues such as benevolence, righteousness, and integrity, the ruler sets an example for the entire society to follow. This moral leadership fosters a harmonious and just society where individuals uphold ethical principles and fulfill their roles and responsibilities.
In contrast, absolute power is not considered an attribute of an ideal ruler in Confucianism. Confucius emphasized the importance of a ruler's accountability to the people and the need for checks and balances to prevent abuses of power. The ruler's authority is not absolute but is grounded in the well-being and prosperity of the governed. A ruler who exercises power without restraint or consideration for the welfare of the people would deviate from the ideal envisioned by Confucianism.
Learn more about Confucianism:
brainly.com/question/32004695
#SPJ11
Rice became an important commercial crop in Georgia
beginning in which decade?
A. the 1730s
B. the 1750s
C. the 1770s
D. the 1790s
Rice was first introduced to Georgia in the 1730s by slaves and freed African Americans from the West Africa Kingdoms of Sierra Leone and Senegal.
The answer is A.
It quickly became an important commercial crop for planters living along the coast of Georgia, especially in the areas of St. Simons Island, Darien, and Sapelo Island. Rice cultivation in Georgia was labor intensive, and it wasn't until the 1770s that planters began to use enslaved workers to expand their commercial cultivation.
Rice cultivation grew in the 1790s, and by the beginning of the 19th century, it had become a major industry in Georgia, with more than 500 plantations employing over 10,000 enslaved African Americans. In that era, Georgia exported more than 10 thousand bushels of rice per year to the Caribbean, Europe, and other colonies in the American colonies. Over the 19th century, rice production in Georgia slowly declined, and by the 1920s the majority of rice acreage in the state had been converted to other crop production.
To know more about African Americans, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29744813
#SPJ4
Arrange the tiles in the correct order for structuring a literary analysis paragraph.
topic sentence
concluding statement
supporting evidence
point about the toplo
explanation of the
sentence
evidence
The order of structuring a literary analysis paragraph is as follows:Topic sentence, Explanation of the topic sentence, Supporting evidence, Explanation of the evidence, Point about the topic, Evidence, Explanation of the evidence, Concluding statement.
Topic sentence: The first sentence of the paragraph, which clearly states the main point you're making about the text. An explanation of how the topic sentence relates to the thesis statement of the essay.
Supporting evidence: Specific examples from the text that support the point you're making in the topic sentence. An explanation of how the evidence supports the point you're making.
Point about the topic: Further analysis of how the evidence relates to the topic and supports the thesis statement.
Evidence: Another piece of specific evidence from the text that supports the point being made. An explanation of how this second piece of evidence supports the point being made.
Concluding statement: A sentence or two that wraps up the paragraph and connects back to the thesis statement.
Learn more about literary analysis paragraph: brainly.com/question/28729592
#SPJ11
what is turner’s evidence for social breakdown and evolution on the frontier?
Frederick Jackson Turner is most famously known for his studies of the American frontier, as well as his ‘frontier thesis’.
He argued that the frontier was critical to the development of American society and unique character. His evidence for social breakdown and evolution on the frontier was based on his observations of the pioneers’ daily lives. Turner argued that the frontier served as an escape from the oppressive class systems of Europe, and citizens achieved greater autonomy away from urban areas and class divisions.
He also concluded that the frontier provided an economically independent social landscape which was conducive to the development of self-government, and increased the public’s participation in democratic processes. Turner believed that society often resorted to violence to resolve disputes on the frontier, but it also caused people to be more tolerant and understanding of others.
This was integral for the development of strong communities, and Turner wrote extensively about the ‘frontier spirit’ and its far-reaching impact on the development of American society.
To know more about Frederick Jackson Turner, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29629446
#SPJ4
how did propaganda shape american views of world war i? how has propaganda shaped american views and mores during other twentieth century events?
Through propaganda, It created a sense of patriotism and national pride, and it also helped to establish a culture of conformity and unquestioning loyalty to the government.
Propaganda played an important role in shaping American views of World War I. Through propaganda, the government sought to control the narrative and manipulate public opinion in favor of the war effort.
The use of propaganda during World War I had a lasting impact on American views and mores. It created a sense of patriotism and national pride, and it also helped to establish a culture of conformity and unquestioning loyalty to the government.
During other twentieth-century events, propaganda continued to shape American views and mores. For example, during World War II, propaganda was used to portray the Japanese as a savage and inferior race, which helped to justify the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan.
Overall, propaganda has played a significant role in shaping American views and mores throughout the twentieth century, and it continues to be used today in various forms to influence public opinion on a wide range of issues.
Learn more about propaganda: brainly.com/question/30188519
#SPJ11
is there a dimension of industry structure that porter’s model appears to omit?
The dimension of industry structure that porter's model appears to omit was the external environmental factors.
The term "external environmental factor" refers to a broader set of economic, social, and technological variables that might have an impact on an industry's or market's competitive dynamics. These uncontrollable variables may present possibilities or hazards to particular firms operations.
Numerous unanticipated pitfalls exist, such as those brought on by globalization, industrialization, and digitalization, which drastically alter customer expectations and spur new competitors in unexpected ways that raise the stakes. Porter's industrial structure model did not account for these hazards, which are typical for industry to confront.
Learn more about Porter's model of industry structure ,
https://brainly.com/question/30613638?
Yes, there is a dimension of industry structure that Porter’s model appears to omit. The correct option among the following given options is option (B) Innovation. Innovation is the dimension of industry structure that Porter’s model appears to omit. What is Porter's Five Forces Model? Porter's Five Forces Model is a competitive strategy framework that assesses an industry's attractiveness (profit potential).
Porter's five forces model examines the bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, the competitive rivalry among existing players, the risk of new entrants, and the threat of substitutes. It is an analytical framework for assessing competitive rivalry, threats of new entrants, threats of substitute products or services, bargaining power of suppliers, and bargaining power of customers. It assists businesses in making informed strategic decisions.
Know more about Porter’s model here:
https://brainly.com/question/30510553
#SPJ11
evaluate the change in mortality over the course of the twentieth century. group of answer choices increased dramatically in the first 50 years and then more gradually in the second 50 years. increased at a very steady rate throughout the 100-year period. increased gradually in the first 50 years and then very dramatically in the second 50 years. did not change significantly.
The mortality rate changed significantly over the course of the twentieth century. It increased gradually in the first 50 years and then experienced a more dramatic increase in the second 50 years.
The mortality rate underwent notable changes during the twentieth century. In the first 50 years, the increase in mortality was relatively gradual. This can be attributed to factors such as improvements in healthcare, advancements in medical technology, and the implementation of public health measures. These developments contributed to a decline in infectious diseases, improved living conditions, and increased life expectancy.
Overall, the mortality rate in the twentieth century followed a pattern of gradual increase in the first 50 years, reflecting improvements in healthcare and public health measures. However, in the second half of the century, the rate of increase became more pronounced due to changing demographic trends and the emergence of new health challenges.
To learn more about mortality.
Click here:brainly.com/question/29376879?
#SPJ11
How did English leaders understand the place and role of the American colonies in England’s empire?
In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, English leaders viewed the American colonies as important components of their empire. England recognized that the colonies had the potential to be economically profitable and provided a market for English goods, raw materials, and trade.
The colonies were thought to provide resources to the mother country, thus enhancing the British economy.In addition to this, the American colonies were viewed as valuable land that could be exploited for profit. English leaders believed that the colonies had the potential to expand westward, providing more land and resources.
The colonies also benefitted from the relationship by being provided with military protection and access to English markets. The colonies were allowed to trade with other European countries, but the majority of their trade was with England.The relationship between England and the American colonies was not always smooth, however. T
To know more about resources visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14289367
#SPJ11
Does the government have the right or power to suppress dissent in wartime? Peacetime? Why or why not?
Do you think the United States would have risked losing World War I had it not passed the Espionage and Sedition Acts and taken other steps to suppress dissent? Why or why not?
Government lacks the authority to suppress dissent as safeguarding freedom of speech is crucial for democracy.
The impact of suppressing dissent on World War I's outcome remains uncertain due to various influential factors.
1) Freedom of speech and expression are fundamental rights that should be upheld by the government, regardless of the circumstances.
In a democratic society, citizens have the right to voice their opinions, criticize government actions, and engage in peaceful dissent. While there may be limitations on free speech to safeguard national security, these limitations must be narrowly tailored, proportionate, and necessary to prevent abuses of power. Suppressing dissent can lead to a stifling of public discourse, hinder social progress, and erode the foundations of democracy.Even in times of war or crisis, it is crucial to foster an environment where diverse perspectives can be heard, as this encourages critical thinking, accountability, and the potential for constructive solutions to emerge. Balancing national security concerns with the protection of civil liberties is a delicate task, but a government must respect and uphold the right to dissent as a cornerstone of democratic governance.2) The United States' decision to pass the Espionage and Sedition Acts during World War I and suppress dissent was driven by concerns about national security and maintaining morale, but the direct impact on the outcome of the war is uncertain.
While dissent and criticism of the government's actions can have negative effects on morale and potentially aid the enemy, they can also serve as catalysts for public debate, accountability, and improved decision-making. The suppression of dissent can create an environment of fear, stifle innovation, and limit the government's ability to adapt and address challenges effectively.Additionally, dissenting voices can act as a check on government actions, encouraging transparency and preventing abuses of power. It is plausible that allowing dissenting voices to be heard could have led to a more nuanced and informed public discourse, potentially influencing policy decisions and improving the war effort. However, the absence of dissent does not guarantee victory, as military strategy, resources, and international alliances also played significant roles in the outcome of World War I. Ultimately, the impact of suppressing dissent on the war's outcome is difficult to ascertain definitively, and it remains a subject of debate among historians and scholars.For more questions on World War
https://brainly.com/question/13382356
#SPJ8
In the 21 century, we see much of Africa ruled by cruel dictators or military leaders. How is this situation connected to European imperialism in Africa?
The colonial system of indirect rule in Africa started a tradition of rule by corrupt leaders.
Buropeans were so cruel that Africans learned to accept cruel treatment by their rulers.
O
Africans have never been able to establish ideals of human rights-after being treated as inferior.
The families of today's African dictators were put in power by impertalinations
In the 21st century, Africa is mostly ruled by cruel dictators or military leaders. The situation is connected to European imperialism in Africa because of the following reasons: The colonial system of indirect rule in Africa began a tradition of rule by corrupt leaders, which continues in many African nations today.
Indirect rule, as defined by the British anthropologist Lord Frederick Lugard, allowed colonial powers to control and exploit African territories while minimizing the expense of maintaining a colonial administration. Africans learned to accept cruel treatment by their rulers as a result of European cruelty. The policies and practices of colonial administrators and European entrepreneurs were often inhumane and exploitative, resulting in the subjugation and oppression of indigenous Africans. Africans never fully established ideals of human rights as a result of being treated as inferior. They were subjected to brutal, oppressive regimes by colonial powers, which persisted after independence. The families of many of today's African dictators were placed in power by imperialists. Many colonial powers had a strategy of co-opting and supporting particular individuals or groups who they believed would assist them in consolidating their control over territories.
Colonial administration refers to the system of governance established by colonial powers in territories under their control. It involves the management and control of these territories, typically located in distant regions or overseas, by the colonial power. The colonial administration's primary objective is to serve the interests of the colonial power while exerting control over the local population and resources.
To get more information about European entrepreneurs visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15718795
#SPJ11
which kind of government was most heavily influenced by the athenian system? responses anarchy anarchy dictatorship dictatorship representative democracy representative democracy absolute monarchy
The government system that was most heavily influenced by the Athenian system is representative democracy.
Representative democracy is a form of government in which citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. Athenian democracy, developed in ancient Athens, Greece, is often considered the earliest example of democracy in history. It featured direct participation of citizens in decision-making, including voting on laws and policies.
While modern representative democracies differ in various aspects from the Athenian system, such as the scale of governance and the use of elected representatives, they draw inspiration from the principles of citizen participation and popular sovereignty that were central to Athenian democracy.
The Athenian system of democracy had a profound impact on the development of representative democracy. In ancient Athens, all eligible citizens had the right to participate directly in the decision-making process through the Assembly, where they could debate and vote on laws. This concept of popular participation and citizen engagement laid the foundation for the idea that government should be based on the will of the people.
Representative democracy, as seen in many modern nations, adopts a similar principle by allowing citizens to elect representatives who then make decisions on their behalf. While the Athenian system was limited to a relatively small city-state, the principles of citizen involvement and democratic decision-making have been expanded and adapted to larger-scale governance in representative democracies worldwide. Therefore, representative democracy stands as the government system most heavily influenced by the Athenian system.
Learn more about Democracy:
brainly.com/question/30078994
#SPJ11
question 1. evaluate the extent to which the gilded age reformers were successful. 05.04
The Gilded Age Reformers were successful to a certain extent. The Gilded Age (1877-1900) was an era of extensive industrialization, significant economic growth, and technological advancement.
The reformers from the Gilded Age focused on making changes to improve the social and economic conditions of the United States. They sought to address various issues in society, including labor exploitation, corruption, and social inequality. Despite their efforts, the Gilded Age Reformers faced numerous challenges and limitations, thus affecting their success.
Here are some of the successes and limitations of the Gilded Age Reformers. Successes of the Gilded Age Reformers
1. Industrial and labor reforms: The Gilded Age Reformers advocated for better working conditions, minimum wage, and fair working hours for laborers. Through their efforts, various labor reforms were introduced, including the establishment of labor unions and the regulation of child labor. The labor reforms led to an improvement in the working conditions of laborers and reduced exploitation.
2. Progressive era reforms: The Gilded Age Reformers were instrumental in the introduction of progressive era reforms. The progressive era reforms focused on reducing corruption and promoting accountability in government. The reforms included the introduction of anti-trust laws, which sought to eliminate monopolies and promote competition. The progressive era reforms led to increased accountability in government and reduced corruption.
Limitations of the Gilded Age Reformers
1. Racism and discrimination: The Gilded Age Reformers were not successful in addressing issues of racism and discrimination. They did not actively advocate for the rights of African Americans, and segregation continued to be a major issue in society.
2. Limited success in women's suffrage: The Gilded Age Reformers made limited progress in promoting women's suffrage. Women were not allowed to vote during this period, and it was only until 1920 that the 19th Amendment was introduced, allowing women to vote.
3. Limited success in achieving social reforms: Despite the efforts of the Gilded Age Reformers, they were not successful in achieving significant social reforms. Social inequality continued to be a major issue in society, and the reforms did not adequately address the needs of all individuals.
Overall, the Gilded Age Reformers were successful to a certain extent, but they faced numerous challenges and limitations. While they were successful in introducing labor reforms and progressive era reforms, they were not successful in addressing issues of racism and discrimination or achieving significant social reforms.
For more about economic growth:
https://brainly.com/question/8043063
#SPJ4
Consider the following research question and choose the primary source that is best suited to answer it.
"What were the long-term consequences of Japanese internment camps in the United States during World War II?"
Primary sources are the raw materials of history. Primary sources are original materials that were created at the time under investigation, such as diaries, letters, speeches, and official documents. These sources are invaluable since they offer firsthand information from people who witnessed or were involved in the event being examined.For instance, personal accounts of Japanese-Americans who were interned in camps during World War II offer a direct perspective of the long-term effects of Japanese internment camps.
By describing the events, they experienced, they provide insight into how internment affected their everyday lives, their communities, and their culture. Personal accounts, letters, and memoirs can be used to show the human cost of internment and the effects that internment had on Japanese-Americans' self-identity and sense of belonging in the US.
Know more about World War II here:
https://brainly.com/question/7589784
#SPJ11
Which Polish labor leader founded the union Solidarity and helped end communism in Poland? Karol Jozef Wojtyla Lech Walesa Wojciech Jaruzelski Andrzej Gwiazda
Answer:
Lech Walesa
Explanation:
According to 1 Kings, the central problem with Solomon's marriages toforeign women was ______.A. Mixed ethnicitiesB. Political compromis
According to 1 Kings, the central problem with Solomon's marriages toforeign women was Political compromis Therefore the correct option is B.
Political compromise According to 1 Kings 11:1-4, King Solomon had many foreign wives and concubines, which was seen as a political compromise that led him away from his devotion to God. The passage states that Solomon loved many foreign women, including Moabites,
Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, and Hittites, which God had expressly forbidden the Israelites from marrying. These marriages ultimately led to Solomon's downfall and the division of the kingdom after his death.
Hence the correct option is B
To know more about Political compromise visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29759513
#SPJ4
What important differences were there between Indian societies in the Southwest, South, and Northeast on the eve of colonization?
Before the colonization, there were some important differences between Indian societies in the Southwest, South, and Northeast. Below are the differences:Southwest Indians:Southwest Indian tribes, such as the Hopi, Zuni, and Pueblo.
The climate in the Southwest was dry, and many of the Indian societies here relied on irrigation for their crops. They were sedentary and also had complex social and religious systems. Additionally, they were matrilineal and maintained a gift-giving economy.Northeast Indians:The Northeast Indian tribes, such as the Iroquois, lived in longhouses.
The Northeast Indians, in general, were less socially stratified than the Southwest Indians.South Indians:South Indian societies, like the Choctaw, Natchez, and Creek, were sedentary and agricultural. They lived in wooden houses and had complex political systems, with the Creek and Choctaw using matrilineal descent.
To know more about colonization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ11
What did Europeans offer Africans in the slave trade? How were slaves obtained from the African interior? Do Barbot and Equiano agree on the methods used? How did Christianity interact with the slave trade? Does Barbot reflect Christian criteria in his slave trade account? Does either of the accounts seem exaggerated? Does Barbot show any signs of distorting his descriptions to make himself look good? Does Equiano exaggerate problems?
During the era of the transatlantic slave change, Europeans provided diverse goods and commodities to Africans in exchange for slaves. These objects protected firearms, ammunition, textiles, alcohol, beads, metallic goods, and synthetic products. The exchange of these goods for slaves was part of a complex community of alternate relationships mounted along the African coast.
Slaves had been received from the Africans indoors through one-of-a-kind methods, together with battle, raids, kidnapping, and shooting people via intertribal conflicts. African intermediaries, inclusive of African investors and chiefs, performed a function in the acquisition and sale of slaves to European slave traders. The strategies used to achieve slaves numerous across regions and time intervals, and the money owed to Barbot and Equiano offers insights into a number of these techniques.
Barbot and Equiano offer distinctive views on the techniques used to achieve slaves. While Barbot, in his account, focuses greater on the industrial components and the cooperation of African investors, Equiano highlights the violence and brutalities related to the slave trade, inclusive of his private experience of being kidnapped and enslaved.
Christianity had a complicated interaction with the slave trade. Some Christian missionaries and abolitionists denounced the slave exchange and recommended the rights and freedom of enslaved Africans. However, Christianity changed into also being used by some European slave investors and owners to justify and perpetuate the organization of slavery.
The presence of Christian beliefs in the context of the slave alternate varies depending on the individuals involved and their interpretation of spiritual teachings.
In Barbot's account, there are instances in which he references Christian values and justifications for his involvement in the slave exchange. He portrays himself as a religious Christian and attempts to reconcile his actions with his nonsecular ideals, despite the fact that his descriptions also reveal the inherent contradictions and moral dilemmas of the slave exchange.
It is critical to method these ancient accounts with a critical lens. Exaggeration and distortion of descriptions have been now not uncommon, as people regularly had personal agendas, biases, or preferred outcomes in presenting their narratives.
Barbot may also have selectively emphasized certain elements or downplayed others to provide himself with an extra favorable light. Equiano, however, may have exaggerated the issues and sufferings he experienced to spotlight the inhumanity and brutality of the slave trade.
Overall, even as each Barbot and Equiano provide valuable insights into the slave change, readers ought to take into account the subjective nature of the money owed and technique them significantly, contemplating the ancient context and the views of the authors.
To know more about slavery,
https://brainly.com/question/18307082
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is true according to the Mandate of Heaven.
A- The Zhou dynasty must rule forever
B- Floods were caused by peasant uprisings
C- If a ruler was corrupt or incompetent, they would love the Mandate of Heaven
D- A dynasty could never be overthrown
it destroyed a european coalition of austrian, polish, bavarian, and saxon forces at vienna in 1683 and held the city for ten years.
The occasion that destroyed a European coalition of Austrian, Polish, Bavarian, and Saxon forces at Vienna in 1683 and held the metropolis for ten years was the Siege of Vienna via the Ottoman Empire. This pivotal event in records marked the climax of the Ottoman-Habsburg wars and had some distance-achieving outcomes for the balance of power in Europe.
In the summer of 1683, the sizable Ottoman army led by Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa Pasha, laid siege to Vienna, the capital of the Habsburg Empire. The town became a strategic stronghold and a key gateway to Central Europe. The coalition of forces from Austria, Poland, Bavaria, and Saxony joined collectively to defend Vienna in opposition to the Ottoman danger.
For months, the defenders of Vienna endured a grueling siege, withstanding regular assaults and desperate tries to breach the metropolis's walls. The state of affairs seemed dire for the European coalition as materials diminished and morale wavered. However, comfort eventually arrived on September 12, 1683, whilst a blended force led by using Polish King Jan III Sobieski released a decisive counter-assault.
Sobieski's cavalry price, famously known as the Battle of Vienna, broke via the Ottoman traces and brought a crushing blow to the besieging army. The Ottoman forces have been routed, and Vienna become liberated from the hazard of occupation. This victory marked a turning point in the centuries-long battle between the Ottoman Empire and Christian Europe.
The defeat at Vienna had profound outcomes for the Ottoman Empire. It shattered the myth of Ottoman invincibility and uncovered the vulnerabilities of their military. Moreover, the failure to seize Vienna halted the Ottoman enhance into Europe and marked the beginning of a slow decline in their territorial expansion.
For the European coalition, the hit protection of Vienna introduced a sense of unity and reinforced the remedy to push back toward Ottoman aggression. The victory at Vienna additionally had wider implications for European geopolitics. It reinforced the power and status of the Habsburgs, bolstered the alliance between Austria and Poland, and helped solidify the wider European competition against the Ottoman Empire.
In conclusion, the Siege of Vienna in 1683, followed with the aid of the successful defense and liberation of the metropolis with the aid of the European coalition, marked a massive turning point in European history. It dealt a severe blow to the Ottoman Empire, halted its enlargement into Europe, and galvanized Christian Europe in its resistance against Ottoman aggression.
To know more about the Ottoman Empire,
https://brainly.com/question/28902104
#SPJ4
The correct question is:
"What event destroyed a European coalition of Austrian, Polish, Bavarian, and Saxon forces at Vienna in 1683 and held the city for ten years? "
the issues behind the compromise of 1850 included all of the following except
The issues behind the compromise of 1850 included all of the following except the Mexican Cession was divided so no slaves would be permitted north of 36°30' (option A).
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five laws that were passed by the US Congress. The laws aimed at solving the territorial and slavery issues that arose after the Mexican–American War (1846–1848). The compromise brought some short term peace, but the slavery issue would continue to cause tensions between the North and South. Slavery would become the driving force behind the political, economic, and social events of the United States during the Civil War.
The issues behind the compromise of 1850 included all of the following except: the Mexican Cession was divided so no slaves would be permitted north of 36°30'. The other four issues were included in the compromise of 1850. These issues are as follows: California was admitted as a free state.Slave trade was ended in Washington, D.C.A stronger fugitive slave law passed.Texas ceded land to New Mexico and had its debts funded. The correct option is A.
The complete question is:
The issues behind the compromise of 1850 included all of the following except
A) the Mexican Cession was divided so no slaves would be permitted north of 36°30'.
B) slave trade was ended in Washington, D.C.
C) California was admitted as a free state.
D) a stronger fugitive slave law passed.
E) Texas ceded land to New Mexico and had its debts funded.
For more about Mexican Cession:
https://brainly.com/question/640114
#SPJ4
In 1973 ______________ landmark case was decided by the supreme court striking down state laws on abortion.
The landmark case decided by the Supreme Court in 1973, striking down state laws on abortion, was Roe v. Wade.
In 1973, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on the case of Roe v. Wade, which had a profound impact on the legal landscape regarding abortion. The court's decision, written by Justice Harry Blackmun, established that the constitutional right to privacy encompasses a woman's right to have an abortion. Prior to this ruling, many states had restrictive laws that criminalized or severely limited access to abortion services.
The Roe v. Wade decision invalidated these laws, recognizing a woman's right to make decisions about her own body during the early stages of pregnancy. This case remains one of the most significant and controversial decisions in the history of the Supreme Court, shaping the ongoing debate on abortion rights in the United States.
To learn more about Supreme Court.
Click here:brainly.com/question/29759733?
#SPJ11
Define "myth". Question 1 options: a story meant to entertain children a lie made up to confuse people a story that explains a mystery about the world a story that gets shared because of how strange it is I give brainlist
Answer: "Myth" is a traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, typically involving supernatural beings or events.
Explanation:
HELP PLEASEEEEEEE THANK YOU
Following Lincoln's election as President of the United States, the Southern states seceded from the Union. The correct answer is option 1.
Fearing that Lincoln's anti-slavery stance would threaten their way of life, several Southern states, starting with South Carolina, declared their independence and formed the Confederate States of America. This secession eventually led to the outbreak of the American Civil War.While the Emancipation Proclamation, issued by Lincoln during the war, declared slaves in Confederate-held territories to be free, it did not immediately abolish slavery in the South. The proclamation primarily aimed to weaken the Confederate war effort and provide a moral basis for the Union's cause.It was only through the Union's military victories and the passage of the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution that slavery was officially abolished throughout the country. Following the Confederate defeat in the Civil War, the Southern states were readmitted to the Union, but this process involved Reconstruction efforts to address the social, economic, and political challenges in the region.Therefore, the correct answer is option 1.For more questions on Lincoln's election
https://brainly.com/question/16444986
#SPJ8
Why was a time period of the 1820s considered a new era in politics?
Answer: Between the 1820s and 1850, as more white males won the right to vote and political parties became more organized, the character of American democracy changed. It became more partisan and more raucous, a turn that bred ambivalence and even discontent with politics and the dominant parties.
Explanation: ↑